Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims

This list will help non-scientists to interrogate advisers and to grasp the limitations of evidence, say William J. Sutherland, David Spiegelhalter and Mark A. Burgman.

  • Differences and chance cause variation.
  • No measurement is exact.
  • Bias is rife
  • Bigger is usually better for sample size.
  • Correlation does not imply causation.
  • Regression to the mean can mislead.
  • Extrapolating beyond the data is risky.
  • Beware the base-rate fallacy.
  • Controls are important.
  • Randomization avoids bias.
  • Seek replication, not pseudoreplication.
  • Scientists are human.
  • Significance is significant.
  • Separate no effect from non-significance.
  • Effect size matters.
  • Study relevance limits generalizations.
  • Feelings influence risk perception.
  • Dependencies change the risks.
  • Data can be dredged or cherry picked.
  • Extreme measurements may mislead.

References
https://www.nature.com/news/policy-twenty-tips-for-interpreting-scientific-claims
Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims [PDF]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Published by

Hadi Nur

Get in touch with me online. This blog has a table of content and mainly written for my own purposes and based on "Google here, Google there." There has never been any claim that this is an original work. You can use the customized search engine to search for anything on this website.